Tag

workforce planning

If There’s a Tire in Your Cup

open palm leadership represented by an illustration of a tire; from the title "tire in your cup"

If you’ve been following this feed, you know how this goes by now: CreativeMornings Phoenix hosts a free monthly talk, one local creative, one theme shared with hundreds of chapters around the world, no pitch, no agenda. I show up most months, notebook in hand, ready to get talked out of whatever I thought I understood walking in. This month did that within the first five minutes – and the speaker had me thinking about something I’m going to call open palm leadership.

Continue Reading

Nobody Gets Promoted for Not Hiring

Org chart illustration showing unchecked headcount growth beneath a single leadership node.

Ask a manager how their year went, and headcount often comes up before revenue does. Not because it’s the most important number – because it’s the easiest one to defend in a room full of people who don’t have time to dig into anything more complicated. Team of six grew to team of eleven? That reads as momentum, even if the actual output barely moved. Team of six stayed a team of six because six was exactly what the work required? That reads as stagnant, even when it’s the smartest call anyone made all year. Somewhere along the way, headcount growth became the scorecard nobody agreed to, and everybody plays by anyway.

Continue Reading

The Headcount Trap

an illustration of an empty chair symbolizing the headcount trap. the chair is blue line-art on a field of bright green.

There is a number that has quietly run a lot of hiring decisions for a long time. Not a budget number. Not a productivity metric. Just a headcount. How many people are on the team. Are there vacant cubicles? Whether the org chart looks the way the org chart was designed to look – it becomes a headcount trap.

It’s a reasonable thing to track. It becomes a problem when it starts standing in for something it was never designed to measure: whether the business actually has the capability it needs to do what it’s trying to do.

Those are different things. And the gap between them has gotten wider.

Continue Reading

The Invisible Ceiling: What to Do When Your Core Team Has Nothing Left to Give

A woman walks with a strange lean through an office space that seems to have an invisible ceiling - illustrating the concept of a core team capacity being reached by hitting an invisible ceiling.

There’s a particular kind of organizational dysfunction that doesn’t announce itself. It doesn’t show up in a boardroom slidedeck or trigger a crisis meeting. It moves quietly – through the organization, through the people, through the work – until one day you look around and realize that your best people are exhausted, your timelines have gotten optimistic in a way that no longer means anything, and the quality of output has drifted just enough that you’ve started wincing at things you used to feel proud of.

This is what hitting core team capacity actually looks like. It’s an invisible ceiling – an unseen, but all too real cap on capacity. Not a dramatic meltdown. A slow, grinding erosion.

Continue Reading

Skill Gaps vs Capacity Gaps

Illustration of two orange human figures; the one on the left is juggling four icons that represent skills, the one on the right is juggling several circles that represent capacity. Each figure is juggling one empty item. The illustration reinforces the idea of skill gaps vs. capacity gaps.

There’s a moment most business leaders know all too well. A project stalls. The deadline starts looking less like a target and more like a double-dog-dare. The roadmap for one product sits untouched while the team sprints on other fires. The instinct is immediate and almost universal: we need more people.

But more people doing what, exactly? And what kind of people – and for how long?

Continue Reading